Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts

Saturday, 10 December 2011

Answering David Wood: Super-Christian to the Rescue


Barely a week passes by without David “The Blazing Crusader” Wood unleashing a rich show of pious zealotry onto the masses, which time after time serves us as a duly reminder of the control that God virus exercises over even what appears to be fairly bright minds of our society.

In that respect, I cannot praise enough the work of Darrel W. Ray who established the half-humorous, half-legit links between behavioral changes of a brain infected with religion and sudden triggers that invoke a complete shut-down of the parts of host's brain that are responsible for analysis of incoming information. I strongly recommend you going through all parts of Darrel’s video collection, which can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-Ug-o9rxWo.

This time around, David releases a video commentary about the recent media frenzy surrounding Tim Tebow and his preposterous and assiduously persistent parading of the beliefs he developed as a sad result of a botched homeschooling job. Since “Christianity under attack” is amongst the most emphatic triggers that cause a complete seizure of rational thinking, David empties his baggage of pre-processed thought devoid of any nutritional value in the form of the article titled “What If Tim Tebow Were Muslim?” (http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2011/12/what-if-tim-tebow-were-muslim.html). And what can be better than to source original ideas from Fox News – an outfit that would give Hitler an uncensored prime-time daily show on the condition that he would incite anti-gay sentiment and close his show with “In Christ we trust, brothers and sisters”.

This is not a story about religious discrimination. I do not recall either Fox News or David vigorously rushing to the defence of the Iranian women’s soccer team that was disqualified from participating in 2012 Olympics due to their insistence on open display of their religious beliefs.  And why would they? After all, the women intended to march around endorsing a false faith. It is quite obvious that such abominable practice should be banned completely. It would be absurd to allow athletes to showcase their personal beliefs on the field, such as fanatic love of a particular brand of beer or adherence to the “Star Wars” rites and rituals. And I can bet a small fortune that deep down inside (or, most likely, openly) Fox News anchors and David Wood himself would roll on the floor in laughter if Tim Tebow were to greet an imaginary Captain Picard with a two-finger salute before and after each run. And so they should, because strong irrational views, especially when they are capable of defining person's behaviour, are not something to support, promulgate or marvel at. However, both David and Fox News feel perfectly fine with someone gesturing to invoke help of their imaginary Christian God.

This story is really about “double standards” that David continues to bring up. I cannot agree more with David. There is no shortage of “double standards” in the US. At times, it does feel like America is a Middle-East county where all “Islam” and “Muhammad” banners and monikers were suddenly replaced with “Christianity” and “Jesus”. The bigotry and zealotry to promote the “one and true” religion is as strong and all-powerful. The offence many take at the slightest sign of blasphemy or religious disrespect, the force of outrage of infuriated pious crowds and the media coverage given to such cases can easily rival similar scenes seen in Pakistan and all over the Middle-East lately.

Things would be different if Tebow were a Muslim. That’s right, David, they would be. Hordes of Christians would cry foul over the “erosion” of faith pillars upon which this country rests. Fox News will strategically cut our scenes from the life broadcasts. Unfurling of praying rugs before the game on the filed will be banned and Tim will be given a small room away from the public eyes to finish off his rituals inconspicuously and privately. However, when he carries a cross to the field, all spotlights are on him to promote Christianity.

Yes, there are “double standards” of which David complains. Everyone must accept the right of pious Christians to market, display and spread their views. Any limitation to the coercive propagation of Christian beliefs causes tempestuous outcries and extensive lobbying to squash perpetrators and silence their feeble voices. However, no other faith or belief is permitted to display its symbols (aside from Judaism, perhaps) as openly and as forcefully as Christianity does. As unfortunate as it is, David and Co. holds the long-end of the stick in the “double standards” game, while complaining about not having enough leverage over imposing his views onto the rest of us.

Sunday, 4 December 2011

Saudi report: Women driving spurs premarital sex

Today is yet another reminder to never underestimate the ability of truly Islamic countries to do and say something really stupid. This time it came in the form of a report given to a high-level advisory group in Saudi Arabia, suggesting that "Women driving spurs premarital sex" (http://news.yahoo.com/saudi-report-women-driving-spurs-premarital-sex-162028628.html)

The topics of sex in religion in general never ceases to surprise me. God appears to be much pre-occupied with his subjects' sex life, more so than with anything else (second only to his jealousy towards people worshipping  other deities, which is always a bigger "no-no" than sex). God wants to control who people have sex with, sometimes how and when. In the sex department, God typically show little interest prohibiting acts that are unimportant to him, like rapes or child molestation or women coerced into sexual relationship. However, God vigilantly watches you to make sure you whispered that magical sentence that somehow makes the act of intercourse legal to you. In case you had sex without or even before uttering the magical spell that legitimises the act, all-loving God will punish you with Hell fire for forgetfulness.

Fortunately, the West has long shaken off the idiocy of this notion. We moved away from laws written by stone-age misogynistic simpletons that are somehow undergone a metamorphosis into the Word of God over the years with all consequent terrors that it brought down to its countless victims. Unless we elect a God-fearing imbecile like Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann or some other worthy follower of Pat "Gays Cause Hurricanes" Robertson to occupy the White  House, we shouldn't fear sliding back to the stone-age absurdity. Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, has never left it and therefore should not fear going back.

Let's review the "Dos" and "Don'ts" of Islamic views on sex:

It is OK:
  • To be a prostitute and use services of a prostitute
  • To engage in spousal rape
  • To rape 
  • To molest children
  • To participate in orgies

However, please remember that the following is strictly prohibited and punishable by stoning to death:
  • Consensual sex between two adults

Monday, 1 August 2011

Muslim Prayer Times for Windows Phone 7 is Finally Here

For those of you who celebrate the ancient pagan festive of Ramadan, you can now download an app for your Windows Phone device to help you stay on top of praying times. The details about the app can be found here: http://wmpoweruser.com/muslim-prayer-times-for-windows-phone-7/

Now, as some of your time has been freed up from seeking out the right moment to offer prayers to Allah, you can spend it sagaciously by thanking Sābi'ūn, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Manat (along with Yahweh and Jesus) for providing countless inspirations to Muhammad for forming his new religion from bits and pieces of other cults.

Cheers to Sābi'ūn!